Skip to main content
Log in

Classification of specimens in the Geonoma stricta (Palmae) complex: the problem of leaf size and shape

  • Articles
  • Published:
Brittonia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Specimens representingGeonoma stricta, a widespread species in the Amazon region, are variable morphologically, especially in leaf size and shape. Ordination and clustering of quantitative morphological variables indicate that the specimens can be classified in at least four different ways, but none of these is fully supported by Discriminant Analysis. The problem revolves around a group of specimens with intermediate leaf size and shape. Mapping of specimens shows that no grouping is geographically separate from any other. An infraspecific classification is not possible based on the data analyzed here. Principal Component Analysis and a test of hybridity indicate that a small percentage of specimens might be of hybrid origin.

Resumen

Espécimens representandoGeonoma stricta, uma espécie amplamente distribuída na região Amazônica, são variáveis morfologicamente, especialmente em forma e tamanho da folha. A ordenação e a análise de grupo das variáveis morfológicas quantitativas, indicam que estes espécimens podem ser classificados em pelo menos quatro diferentes caminhos, mas nenhum completamente sustentado pela análise discriminante. O problema gira em torno do grupo de espécimens com folhas de tamanho e forma intermediários. O mapeamento dos espécimens mostra que nenhum grupo está separado geograficamente do outro. A classificação infraespecífica não é possível baseada nos dados analisados. A análise dos componentes principais e um teste de híbridos indicam que uma pequena porcentagem dos espécimens podem ser híbridos.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Borchsenius, F. 1999. Morphological variation inGeonoma cuneata in western Ecuador. Mem. New York Bot. Gard. 83: 131–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burret, M. 1930. Geonomeae americanae. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 63: 123–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, G. &M. Crisp. 1998. Morphometric and phylogenetic analysis of theDaviesia ulicifolia complex (Fabaceae, Mirbelieae). Pl. Syst. Evol. 209: 93–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crisp, M. &P. Weston. 1993. Geographic and ontogenetic variation in morphology of Australian waratahs (Telopea: Proteaceae). Syst. Biol. 42: 49–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fritsch, P. &S. Lucas. 2000. Clinal variation in theHalesia carolina complex (Styracaceae). Syst. Bot. 25: 197–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galeano, G. 1991. Las palmas de la región de Araracuara. Tropenbos, Colombia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, A. 1995. The palms of the Amazon. Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • —,G. Galeano &R. Bernal. 1995. Field guide to the palms of the Americas. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, G. 1999. Evolution in theAcalypha gracilens/ monococca complex (Euphorbiaceae): morphological analysis. Syst. Bot. 23: 269–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loo, A., H. Tan, P. Kumar &L. Saw. 2001. Intraspecific variation inLicuala glabra Griff. (Palmae) in Peninsula Malaysia—a morphometric analysis. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 72: 115–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naczi, R., A. Reznicek &B. Ford. 1998. Morphological differentiation in theCarex willdenowii complex (Cyperaceae). Amer. J. Bot. 85: 434–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Negrón-Ortiz, V. &J. Hickey. 1996. The genusErnodea (Rubiaceae) in the Atlantic basin. II. Morphological analyses and systematics. Syst. Bot. 21: 445–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pimentel, R. 1979. Morphometrics: the multivariate analysis of biological data. Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company, Dubuque, Iowa, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogstad, S. 1989. The biosystematics and evolution of thePolyalthia hypoleuca complex (Annonaceae) of Malesia, I. Systematic treatment. J. Arnold Arbor. 70: 153–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohlf, F. 2000. NTSYS. Numerical taxonomy and multivariate analysis system. Version 2.1. Exeter Software, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sneath, P. &R. Sokal. 1973. Numerical taxonomy. W. H. Freeman, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spooner, D., R. Van Den Berg &J. Miller. 2001. Species and series boundaries ofSolanum seriesLongipedicellata (Solanaceae) and phenetically similar species in ser.Demissa and ser.Tuberosa: implications for a practical taxonomy of sectionPetota. Amer. J. Bot. 87: 113–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, S. &T. Lammers. 1997. Phenetic analysis of morphological variation in theLobelia cardinalis complex (Campanulaceae: Lobelioideae). Syst. Bot. 22: 315–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vásquez Martínez, R., Rudas Lleras, A. &C. M. Taylor. 1997. Florula de las reservas biológicas de Iquitos, Perú: Allpahuayo-Mishana, Explornapo Camp, Explorama Lodge. Missouri Botanical Garden, St. Louis, Missouri.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wessels Boer, J. 1968. The geonomoid palms. Verh. Kon. Ned. Akad. Wetensch., Afd. Natuurk., Tweede Sect. ser 2, 58: 1–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, L. 1997. Systat Statistics version 7.0 for Windows. SPSS, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, P. 1992. On inferring hybridity from morphological intermediacy. Taxon 41: 11–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Henderson, A., Martins, R. Classification of specimens in the Geonoma stricta (Palmae) complex: the problem of leaf size and shape. Brittonia 54, 202–212 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1663/0007-196X(2002)054[0202:COSITG]2.0.CO;2

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1663/0007-196X(2002)054[0202:COSITG]2.0.CO;2

Key words

Navigation